From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26090 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2013 01:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 26082 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2013 01:31:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,SARE_SUB_6CONS_WORD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:31:38 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UAsLR-00039Z-H8 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:31:37 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:31:37 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:31:35 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UAsLO-0006u3-HO; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:31:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:31:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Richard Henderson CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/26] arm: Implement armv6t2 optimized strchr, strrchr, rawmemchr In-Reply-To: <1361934986-17018-23-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Message-ID: References: <1361934986-17018-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1361934986-17018-23-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Richard Henderson wrote: > Not specifically speed tested against the byte-by-byte versions, > but expected to be about as fast as the new strlen. I think any such string function patch needs measured performance information compared to the previous version, not just "expected to be about as fast". -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com