From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28218 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2013 15:28:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 28209 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2013 15:28:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:28:40 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UEiAw-00020z-Fd from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:28:38 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:28:37 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:28:36 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UEiAt-0008E7-5y; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:28:35 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:28:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Andreas Jaeger CC: "libc-ports@sourceware.org" , Subject: Re: How to handle patches for it AM33? In-Reply-To: <513CA010.9000200@suse.com> Message-ID: References: <513CA010.9000200@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > I have posted a patch for AM33 and nobody reviewed it - it seems we do not > have a maintainer. > > Will someobdy else step up and review this, should I ignore am33 - or just > commit it? My view is just commit if you have a patch. We've been waiting since I reviewed the update patch for a revised version that takes account of my review (and of course of all the global changes in libc since then that require corresponding port changes). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com