From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16030 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2013 16:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 15995 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2013 16:29:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:37 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UFoYZ-0007KZ-3a from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:29:35 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:29:34 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:33 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UFoYV-0005TY-Qn; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:31 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Carlos O'Donell , Andreas Schwab , Marcus Shawcroft , Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: use lib64 as default lib and slib directory In-Reply-To: <20130313134646.GU12913@tucnak.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <51408226.7020808@redhat.com> <20130313134646.GU12913@tucnak.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > However, there was some recent discussion about this in gcc. > > > > Jakub, What's the status? > > No progress there, see the > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00288.html > thread. I'd really like to get it resolved before we cut > GCC 4.8.0-rc1 this week. If it does change to /lib64, it would seem odd for the dynamic linker path (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in aarch64-linux.) to stay as /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 rather than also being in /lib64 (although s390 also puts the 64-bit dynamic link in /lib). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com