From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25724 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2013 14:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25715 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2013 14:24:27 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,TW_CP autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:24:27 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UXBTl-0002gC-14 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:24:25 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:24:25 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:24:22 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UXBTh-00064S-NH; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:24:21 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:24:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Will Newton CC: , Patch Tracking Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: Add Cortex-A15 optimized NEON and VFP memcpy routines, with IFUNC. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <517F9458.8060407@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Will Newton wrote: > > libc changes need to go to libc-alpha, and it's not appropriate to put > > such an architecture-specific change in the toplevel configure script > > anyway. Any such architecture-specific checks have to go in appropriate > > sysdeps configure or preconfigure fragments. > > Sorry, I had missed the significance of those files, I'll move the > check there. I assume once I do that there will be no need to send the > patch to libc-alpha (as it will only be touching ports code)? Yes, once the patch is entirely within the ARM port it doesn't need to go to libc-alpha. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com