From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21975 invoked by alias); 15 May 2013 15:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21957 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2013 15:48:37 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 15:48:37 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UcdwR-0005SA-2t from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 15 May 2013 08:48:35 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 15 May 2013 08:48:34 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 15 May 2013 16:48:32 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UcdwM-0004Q6-OD; Wed, 15 May 2013 15:48:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:48:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: , Thomas Schwinge , , Andreas Jaeger , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [PING][BZ #15442][PATCH] MIPS/glibc: soft-fp NaN representation corrections In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 On Tue, 14 May 2013, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2013, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > > The patch itself looks fine to me, but I think someone else should review > > > it as well. > > > > I will appreciate that too -- ping? > > Ping. Can someone please do this second review? The change proposed was > posted here: . CC:ing Andreas and Richard as the most likely second reviewers.... -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com