From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27227 invoked by alias); 15 May 2013 21:16:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27160 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2013 21:16:54 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 21:16:54 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Ucj47-0006vc-Ul from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:16:51 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 15 May 2013 14:16:51 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 15 May 2013 22:16:50 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ucj45-0000Mt-1d; Wed, 15 May 2013 21:16:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 21:16:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Carlos O'Donell CC: "libc-ports@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [COMMITTED] hppa: Update libm-test-ulps. In-Reply-To: <5193FA4F.30401@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <5193B7DD.4090600@redhat.com> <5193FA4F.30401@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On Wed, 15 May 2013, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I've never regenerated from scratch. We have not recommended that in > Regeneration or the release process. I always regenerate incrementally > from the existing file. Though I see your point that we should probably > make this mandatory. It's commonly been done for non-x86 architectures, to update the file for ulps reductions and tests that have changed name; I try to do it for ARM, MIPS and powerpc-nofpu each freeze. (For x86 the dependency on x87 implementation and compiler excess precisions makes it riskier, but I still think we should do it sometimes.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com