From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22094 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2013 21:36:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22059 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jun 2013 21:36:01 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,TW_CP autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:36:00 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Uoh5h-0005K7-ND from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:35:57 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:35:57 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:35:56 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uoh5f-000591-2z; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:35:55 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:36:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Roland McGrath CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH roland/arm-ifunc-test] ARM: Clean up __libc_ifunc_impl_list In-Reply-To: <20130617205540.06E142C09B@topped-with-meat.com> Message-ID: References: <20130617205540.06E142C09B@topped-with-meat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Roland McGrath wrote: > +#ifndef __ARM_NEON__ > + use_neon = (GLRO(dl_hwcap) & HWCAP_ARM_NEON) != 0; > +# define __memcpy_neon memcpy > +#endif I don't understand why this #define is present for the runtime-determined-NEON case (to match the existing code, I'd think it should rather be for the compile-time-NEON-enabled case). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com