From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11516 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2013 19:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11499 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2013 19:32:38 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:32:37 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VBVBq-0001hI-IB from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:32:34 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:32:35 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:32:32 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VBVBn-00033D-Ct; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:32:31 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:32:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBCw61sa2E=?= CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Fix typos. In-Reply-To: <20130818220954.GA20381@domone> Message-ID: References: <20130813082629.GA27180@domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz> <20130818164943.GA7418@domone> <20130818220954.GA20381@domone> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Ondrej Bilka wrote: > data packet */ \n-#define ACK 04 /* acknowledgement */ \n #define ERROR 05 > data packet */ \n+#define ACK 04 /* acknowledgment */ \n #define ERROR 05 > ^^ > me */ \n-#define TSP_ACK 2 /* generic acknowledgement */ \n #define TSP_MASTER > me */ \n+#define TSP_ACK 2 /* generic acknowledgment */ \n #define TSP_MASTERR > ^^ > quence number */ \n-tcp_seq th_ack; /* acknowledgement number */ \n # if __BYT > quence number */ \n+tcp_seq th_ack; /* acknowledgment number */ \n # if __BYTE > ^^ > uence number */ \n-tcp_seq th_ack; /* acknowledgement number */ \n #if __BYTE_ > uence number */ \n+tcp_seq th_ack; /* acknowledgment number */ \n #if __BYTE_O > ^^ > n-waiting to be sent. Stop looking for acknowledgement of data already \n sent; > n+waiting to be sent. Stop looking for acknowledgment of data already \n sent; > ^^ > nce and tone of each of the contributor acknowledgements and/or \n dedications g > nce and tone of each of the contributor acknowledgments and/or \n dedications gi > ^^ This is still an English variant issue, where both spellings are valid, and so does not belong in a typo fix patch. > ne TSP_TEST 21 /* for testing election algo */ \n #define TSP_SETDATE 22 /* Ne > ne TSP_TEST 21 /* for testing election algorithm */ \n #define TSP_SETDATE 22 > ^ ^ This is still a case of an abbreviation being used in informal writing that does not need expanding. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com