From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26906 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2013 15:04:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26883 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2013 15:04:48 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:04:48 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VCWRJ-0007fp-Eh from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:04:45 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:04:45 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:04:42 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VCWRF-0001Ip-PK; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:04:41 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:04:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBCw61sa2E=?= CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] Fix typos. In-Reply-To: <20130822135612.GA7635@domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: References: <20130813082629.GA27180@domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz> <20130818164943.GA7418@domone> <20130818220954.GA20381@domone> <20130822135612.GA7635@domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Ondrej Bilka wrote: > uf_base = fp->_IO_buf_end = NULL; \n-/* Cancelling close should be avoided if po > uf_base = fp->_IO_buf_end = NULL; \n+/* Canceling close should be avoided if pos > ^ ^ > \n-/* Cancelling close should be avoided if po > \n+/* Canceling close should be avoided if pos > ^ ^ > { \n-/* We are cancelling ourselves, so it is easy to s > { \n+/* We are canceling ourselves, so it is easy to su > ^ ^ This is an English variant issue and should not be included in a typo fix patch. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com