From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32378 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2013 15:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32360 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2013 15:39:16 -0000 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:39:16 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VPDeo-0002jp-E0 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:39:10 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.108]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:39:10 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:39:08 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VPDel-0003xP-ER; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:39:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:39:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: "Ryan S. Arnold" CC: libc-alpha , libc-ports Subject: Re: e500 port: getcontext / setcontext / swapcontext In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Ryan S. Arnold wrote: > Structurally I'm fine with this patch. It's as non-invasive as can be > expected. What about the substance of the patch - is that OK? -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com