From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30567 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2014 22:53:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30557 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2014 22:53:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:53:53 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1W5kCa-0003EI-M5 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:53:48 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:53:48 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:53:47 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W5kCY-0007Z8-Dj; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:53:46 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:53:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Mark Salter CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH] am33: bring port up to date with NPTL support In-Reply-To: <1340030785-32581-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1340030785-32581-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Any news on updating this patch for my review comments posted in June 2012, and for all the subsequent relevant global changes in glibc for which the port wasn't updated (or for which new files in the patch need updating), with a view to getting it checked in so a further review of how current the port is regarding global changes can be made on the basis of a substantially working checked-in port? I really don't think it makes sense just to leave the port around in such a bit-rotten state; either it should be fixed, or it should be removed from glibc (with of course the potential to add a port to this architecture again in future if one is posted that is up-to-date with current glibc). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com