From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10270 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2014 22:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10250 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2014 22:07:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:07:26 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1WfGBP-00024J-2S from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:07:23 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:07:22 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:07:20 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WfGBL-0004aC-Dv; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:07:19 +0000 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:07:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Carlos O'Donell CC: GNU C Library , "libc-ports@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: The hppa port is now moved out of ports. In-Reply-To: <5360206C.3040500@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <535F60AC.4050702@redhat.com> <536019AC.1000602@redhat.com> <5360206C.3040500@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 04/29/2014 05:46 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > >> * Use libc-ports to highlight cross-port issues so maintainers > >> need not pay close attention to libc-alpha. > > > > I thought the conclusion was not to do that (that I was the only person > > suggesting repurposing libc-ports like that), but developers not updating > > all ports have the responsibility to draw attention to that fact and > > update when checking in the > > patch that only updates some ports. > > So what did we decide we were going to do with libc-ports? I believe we decided to stop using libc-ports altogether. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com