From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17307 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2012 16:27:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 17282 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jul 2012 16:27:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:27:41 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Sqo96-00025u-Hg from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:27:40 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:27:39 -0700 Received: from [172.30.1.45] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:27:37 +0100 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:27:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: "Joseph S. Myers" , Richard Sandiford CC: , Subject: Re: Update MIPS32 ABI baselines for _gp_disp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Since I last ran check-abi tests for MIPS32, it appears something has > changed in how the special _gp_disp symbols get reported in those tests. > I've applied this patch to update the baselines accordingly. You seem to be curing the symptoms here, it looks like a bug in binutils to me. The _gp_disp symbol has no fixed value (it's "distance from PC to GP" used for relocs in text; it has special rules even for that, to determine the actual value of the PC to be used against) and as such it shouldn't get past the static link. I can see it's now exported as a dynamic symbol even. Richard, do you happen to know what is going on here? Maciej