From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31343 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2018 19:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-stable-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Sender: libc-stable-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31328 invoked by uid 89); 5 Apr 2018 19:53:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.99.4 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: mail-qt0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 19:53:02 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w12so28237233qti.4 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:53:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FXtNF2capaR+qzfkQH4btOUTtmRk+xQQPXzOuDEXuxs=; b=PPYuEa3d03AKMY74mwS2/9Tcq3t4phPSG6NsOFLvN4cx8MJI3ypAKeHe6aVpYZ54Hx jBTwK0gGEtJhXKZYSvwNLyoNANTP2lsQchagukKokPNDnGVfLNv+9uvxP6tWz+4OP4n9 Ai13OBblHlb4rLUeHRCmzdUYRHDHH5TXrvzkounoUsPeRnxHpmQoQFKZ5ixTOR/+LbOj bjrGjwkccumgZlDkuQIc4599//JnSPusjyTtmmaBm6GTkC6SQlM75QqQy5JnXNG+n2LQ Z99QohEzmvkI6fFhVW8WWBIKjt+dX0NbKWxqvX072ow2B9l3wCSxd+pTVrM9UbL5n9fF w8jw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCDUZXpkuzbi6dTtG6kAj8KuNPWdJ6Kg4MD8cTZoZzTw17jZYj8 Uoz77XInth63emnrmdfleSu47bCVhaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49o38jr3OQKqTQIH1vEBnYEW8gTdQgzF2BvM7xc5nVYgrl8j8+gL7HSl+Lios+hTJf5c+58zQ== X-Received: by 10.237.41.194 with SMTP id o60mr33715414qtd.197.1522957980062; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.150.73.190] (217.sub-174-207-1.myvzw.com. [174.207.1.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d198sm6313821qkg.91.2018.04.05.12.52.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.22 v2] Fix integer overflows in internal memalign and malloc functions [BZ #22343] To: Arjun Shankar , Raphael Moreira Zinsly , rzinsly@linux.ibm.com Cc: libc-stable@sourceware.org References: <1522269821-15007-10-git-send-email-rzinsly@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1522853427-31036-1-git-send-email-rzinsly@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <849afbf6-73c7-6004-a221-c559c6cdb3f2@redhat.com> <20180405194944.GA44061@aloka.lostca.se> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <20f4622e-7ecd-1471-e792-e44bdedb07e9@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180405194944.GA44061@aloka.lostca.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On 04/05/2018 02:49 PM, Arjun Shankar wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 20:29 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >>> +#include >> >> This can't possibly work for release/2.22/master, there was no support >> infrastructure? > > I'm working on backporting *just* enough bits into 2.22 to: > > 1. Include support/ infrastructure (Florian wrote a script that does this) > > 2. Have glibc-2.22 compile with a new-ish GCC (7.3) - > This needs 8 additional commits > > 3. Include fix in question; i.e. BZ #22343 I missed that IBM already posted the support/ backport here: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-stable/2018-04/msg00004.html Please coordinate with IBM :-) > Cheers, > Arjun > > > > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 20:29 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >>> > > +#include >> > >> > This can't possibly work for release/2.22/master, there was no support >> > infrastructure? > > I'm working on backporting *just* enough bits into 2.22 to: > > 1. Include support/ infrastructure (Florian wrote a script that does this) > > 2. Have glibc-2.22 compile with a new-ish GCC (7.3) - > This needs 8 additional commits > > 3. Include fix in question; i.e. BZ #22343 > > Cheers, > Arjun > -- Cheers, Carlos.