From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686343858C50 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:36:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 686343858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: Joseph Myers Cc: libc-stable@sourceware.org, WANG Xuerui , toolchain@gentoo.org Subject: [Disregard my previous mail] Re: Please backport some GCC 13 build fixes Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 15:35:56 +0100 Message-ID: <3199754.aeNJFYEL58@pinacolada> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: References: <22430a37-0de8-51f7-0158-356277490dff@gentoo.org> <111260289.nniJfEyVGO@pinacolada> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3205893.44csPzL39Z"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --nextPart3205893.44csPzL39Z Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: Joseph Myers Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 15:35:56 +0100 Message-ID: <3199754.aeNJFYEL58@pinacolada> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Am Montag, 21. November 2022, 21:37:18 CET schrieb Joseph Myers: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Andreas K. Huettel via Libc-stable wrote: >=20 > > > * 3e5760fcb4 ("Update _FloatN header support for C++ in GCC 13") > > > * ba70f69598 ("Fix iseqsig for _FloatN and _FloatNx in C++ with GCC= 13") > > > * f66780ba46 ("Fix build with GCC 13 _FloatN, _FloatNx built-in > > > functions") > >=20 > > FWIW, I added these three commits to our 2.36 and got some FP test fail= ures > > requiring distinct changes in ulps. >=20 > These aren't meant to change the code generated for glibc (with any given= =20 > GCC version that worked for building glibc before those changes, so GCC 1= 2=20 > or before) at all, so it would be a good idea to investigate why the=20 > generated code changed. My apologies; this was *not* caused by the three commits listed above. So, from my point of view there are no problems at all with backporting the= m. The changes which broke the tests must have crept into the/our release bran= ch earlier. Searching. =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) --nextPart3205893.44csPzL39Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQKTBAABCgB9FiEE/Rnm0xsZLuTcY+rT3CsWIV7VQSoFAmODdcxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEZE MTlFNkQzMUIxOTJFRTREQzYzRUFEM0RDMkIxNjIxNUVENTQxMkEACgkQ3CsWIV7V QSp07Q/9FBCSX/2MAAjaXzL7xbAVjBlc4zLzl2qFJp3/TZwKHKGNjNnZyVk5l2et 48tH2sUDY2aiYG2P1ofbDcRj9PD8vCqZczwDoYr1uhG+L7H4VwF7vS/aCwZsdQxw zYq+scaQJ5UNZokQdOBJ3Ku+zwDSdtt788WL8saF2JvTe74BeU1JmHVfV5UGEQKN BMssHT3c7mubjFTxTrOZwA7TrmAVOVkYgog/2q8FbjWrjhzFbNh5w6RzPyFNUrDK KT0O/STeUuJAhasdeUiwkI9exeQJSfAImDTPSCh5V0DuAweG4pd3KN8ulzZdgutm wHwwnB2TmIBo6MIeFjfoaFw6XqJSEGC0TWt+UHB+OPLnwaZMXcPX/2n6Xrvj3sbc Dxv6GZMJ+h8bjt6Cp+KshJ9la6EaOQ2NfnQBLQTAaQ9VVRbyvdLx77qsOZPxQwdC K5GIpOrVrHx90plrcZhXxQb0Y3RtMSZXehMDnjqU8RIOjcVZ/d+isg226IKuu8Ie cMwUmErwvEIVCXSSqoFXslDigJ4HUEsTouJWhX7qqopYQU5pz6D/q7x3+5Ue42Fy SERAB0W30LR8mwdXLmUkqzovjp2mIxV4qHAi3kPP1Xw9N1q4LK+wm5F91pZMFcYe 5o1G+RMZ4aub46att1WZ0B5hZfuhoLwtC6jtZUgSQDP/1A5sezg= =qJK8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3205893.44csPzL39Z--