From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Dragan Mladjenovic <dmladjenovic@wavecomp.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: "libc-stable@sourceware.org" <libc-stable@sourceware.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: Backport of mips: Force RWX stack for hard-float builds that can run on pre-4.8 kernels
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63b10756-ce8f-0bfe-9ace-9b8ff664db2f@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abbf8c00-86b8-2b6c-47be-dd636617ecc8@linaro.org>
On 04/11/2019 10:41, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> On 01/11/2019 10:39, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote:
>> On 01.11.2019. 12:49, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2019 06:02, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote:
>>>> On 31.10.2019. 18:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> * Dragan Mladjenovic:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for this really late response. I finally managed to get my test
>>>>>> machines in order. If it helps, I rechecked old releases and patched
>>>>>> ones on 5.3 kernel /-hard-float/-EB/-mabi=o32/n32/n64 w/ and w/o
>>>>>> exec-stack by default and there were no new failures. What do I do next?
>>>>>> Do I need to get the approval of release manager for each branch
>>>>>> individually?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, if it fixes a bug and does not add symbols, you can backport it on
>>>>> your own and commit it. We expect some diligence regarding testing, but
>>>>> we have no way of enforcing that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Florian
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But I don't have write access to the glibc repo. I would be grateful if
>>>> someone who can do it for me. I can provide patches that apply to each
>>>> branch without change if it helps to ease the friction of backporting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> Dragan
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alright, just point me to a repo and I can sort this out for you.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> I'm targeting release/2.24/master...release/2.30/master branches.
>> I don't have a publicly visible repo with the patches.
>> If it helps, there are patches for each of the branches in the attachment.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dragan
>>
>
> Right, I will try to sort this out this week. I won't have time to
> check all the backports on expected supported kernel configuration,
> so I will just to build smoke tests.
>
Done.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-01 0:00 Dragan Mladjenovic
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Dragan Mladjenovic
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Dragan Mladjenovic
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Dragan Mladjenovic
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Dragan Mladjenovic
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2019-01-01 0:00 ` Dragan Mladjenovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63b10756-ce8f-0bfe-9ace-9b8ff664db2f@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dmladjenovic@wavecomp.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=libc-stable@sourceware.org \
--cc=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).