public inbox for libc-stable@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [2.32] struct _Unwind_Exception alignment should not depend on compiler flags
       [not found] <20201116204659.40340-1-msc@linux.ibm.com>
@ 2020-11-16 20:49 ` Matheus Castanho
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matheus Castanho @ 2020-11-16 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tuliom, fweimer, Libc-stable Mailing List

Sorry, sent to the wrong list.

- libc-alpha
+ libc-stable

On 11/16/20 5:46 PM, Matheus Castanho via Libc-alpha wrote:
> From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> 
> Hi Florian and Tulio,
> 
> Could we backport this patch to the 2.32 branch? It would be helpful to fix the
> issue downstream.
> 
> Thanks,
> Matheus Castanho
> 
> ---8<---
> 
> __attribute__((__aligned__)) selects an alignment that depends on
> the micro-architecture selected by GCC flags.  Enabling vector
> extensions may increase the allignment.  This is a problem when
> building glibc as a collection of ELF multilibs with different
> GCC flags because ld.so and libc.so/libpthread.so/&c may end up
> with a different layout of struct pthread because of the
> changing offset of its struct _Unwind_Exception field.
> 
> Tested-By: Matheus Castanho <msc@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> (cherry picked from commit 30af7c7fa13e17d82c3f1f91536384715844f432)
> ---
>  sysdeps/generic/unwind.h | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sysdeps/generic/unwind.h b/sysdeps/generic/unwind.h
> index b667a5b652..c229603af3 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/generic/unwind.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/generic/unwind.h
> @@ -75,15 +75,21 @@ typedef void (*_Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn) (_Unwind_Reason_Code,
> 
>  struct _Unwind_Exception
>  {
> -  _Unwind_Exception_Class exception_class;
> -  _Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn exception_cleanup;
> -  _Unwind_Word private_1;
> -  _Unwind_Word private_2;
> -
> -  /* @@@ The IA-64 ABI says that this structure must be double-word aligned.
> -     Taking that literally does not make much sense generically.  Instead we
> -     provide the maximum alignment required by any type for the machine.  */
> -} __attribute__((__aligned__));
> +  union
> +  {
> +    struct
> +    {
> +      _Unwind_Exception_Class exception_class;
> +      _Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn exception_cleanup;
> +      _Unwind_Word private_1;
> +      _Unwind_Word private_2;
> +    };
> +
> +    /* The IA-64 ABI says that this structure must be double-word aligned.  */
> +    _Unwind_Word unwind_exception_align[2]
> +      __attribute__ ((__aligned__ (2 * sizeof (_Unwind_Word))));
> +  };
> +};
> 
> 
>  /* The ACTIONS argument to the personality routine is a bitwise OR of one
> --
> 2.26.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-11-16 20:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20201116204659.40340-1-msc@linux.ibm.com>
2020-11-16 20:49 ` [2.32] struct _Unwind_Exception alignment should not depend on compiler flags Matheus Castanho

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).