From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117993 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2019 17:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-stable-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Sender: libc-stable-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117978 invoked by uid 89); 31 Oct 2019 17:18:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.3 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:679, H*Ad:U*siddhesh X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:18:37 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572542316; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=P/oT8BRuOEO8KLMMbQ+nwuGIJVN5iyPUEWFnl50gASU=; b=YE4Dl9LUV+VxfvJTLU6P3SwUGE1IWCyyeSc9J20Xo2MBv9yXxjMJSAdBWYNj/zBWS4jsdg 90HWIG1rsXgHE5nHrwki4EGTKfkNnIwad02kSYY/N2Djd6pPFITuxLA0vW0+Dc0Xc4qSpA t//p2DOw+fqXu+7VIrgClo1JE267uYg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-97-hTLTo7eRMdCRKg-oRKkkDQ-1; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:18:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 424631005500; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-117-172.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.172]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D807A5D6D8; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:18:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Dragan Mladjenovic Cc: Adhemerval Zanella , "libc-stable\@sourceware.org" , Carlos O'Donell , Siddhesh Poyarekar , "Dmitry V. Levin" , Joseph Myers Subject: Re: Backport of mips: Force RWX stack for hard-float builds that can run on pre-4.8 kernels References: <5D66BB51.8000404@wavecomp.com> <5D6FADC0.3060301@wavecomp.com> <4942384b-3d97-57c5-0e26-3cfebb4c755d@linaro.org> <5DBB1083.20301@wavecomp.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5DBB1083.20301@wavecomp.com> (Dragan Mladjenovic's message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:49:20 +0000") Message-ID: <87tv7ox28v.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-MC-Unique: hTLTo7eRMdCRKg-oRKkkDQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 * Dragan Mladjenovic: > Sorry for this really late response. I finally managed to get my test=20 > machines in order. If it helps, I rechecked old releases and patched=20 > ones on 5.3 kernel /-hard-float/-EB/-mabi=3Do32/n32/n64 w/ and w/o=20 > exec-stack by default and there were no new failures. What do I do next?= =20 > Do I need to get the approval of release manager for each branch=20 > individually? No, if it fixes a bug and does not add symbols, you can backport it on your own and commit it. We expect some diligence regarding testing, but we have no way of enforcing that. Thanks, Florian