From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23958 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2017 20:05:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-stable-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Sender: libc-stable-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23060 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2017 20:05:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.99.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-25.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1439 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-25.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-oi0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f53.google.com) (209.85.218.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 20:05:23 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l74so34942oih.1; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:05:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gGJAh8sYZXZrswL+ar7EDFn6Wi4LBsJwK6RYNlxiKaA=; b=izXto5wwujKhbX/f4/p0jXFu+/aPtyB/JxHVVrWouL1gPPHniddXIjC+ifA37nasPg 4R65s4qheENI1RbvACR3YJ+l/XOem6dP2QbFOY3M4jQXIOa4NBa5xtQS+BWNVT6qet4v 6Qv0VzbFQVWjNlvc7pcxJYK0En2svE+JQoKh0NyHmYazAXjGwZMcShd8D/uQPFLXzKu3 SQSy00UQqRYUDSt/szhTImQqphAETmXk4i/ygZuwsRGzsIXDzR4gvVWVDLvQDTZyuWbl h2DVCjHKgGlZ/jxKDQpBBqnJ8hBPRNd2ADf/Q4DwSJDh75BOdkIIVDHzXSvk27hYP1la jlKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gGJAh8sYZXZrswL+ar7EDFn6Wi4LBsJwK6RYNlxiKaA=; b=VMIWr8oI+hWAPEjitCJWd4CAwr47xiqA0sqguGUMoupGwAJCzVK7v3bOLl96RxEZGH /AnGc2sJxCaNMiGu5a3rcSYzvy2di32F+RD9OHY/ngZW591ERTRk0BBQO5llJAdYLHIF EEvkrl5zQ6CRJ0GVtzaYQVlIWuojPUvxG3ibDooXc+Bg20j80irVRY7z74PanCohJ6k6 MxuI5TfjFSgAA0+4r+vnA1epiBPT28LrtjmRxvLul6gPhBBSJAliv/1jBnlPSlsnYC/r M+d+k1H1e596qsjykGjtIgrAP32aDI10GqKIKhI+xd5xTDUGefMxYpOjyqzS5qWJEDyX ymqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhirSh0JO/z4XOKVeoMTqc43gkZKAIApnUTDCJLtnK/qWg7Zjq+ 1QJa14qngPaGXtQiCuZ08c/DnAIVCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCBH9LrirN8lN59kGtzUB2RFCN9U4C7eipgnXeEmfqDIaD5W74fSyXuKTl783QjPecWa8RSzBPvNgW/7kdxzrs= X-Received: by 10.202.237.150 with SMTP id l144mr602510oih.88.1504814722145; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.136.75 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:05:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8d30c0c3-0b00-fc08-8e49-811aec114ef9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <878tpry1ce.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <4c0d8778-916b-43d4-3206-2653f3696390@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170224095709.GA4243@altlinux.org> <956dda0f-fd50-f940-f69b-5f22b7237215@cs.ucla.edu> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Get rid of duplicate const declaration specifier warning in tst-resolv-qtypes.c. To: Paul Eggert Cc: Stefan Liebler , GNU C Library , Libc-stable Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a113d12d0f778c205589efaa5" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 --001a113d12d0f778c205589efaa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-length: 525 On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>> Why not: >>> >>> static const char domain[] = "www.example.com"; >>> >>> instead, before you backport? It's simpler and less confusing. > > >> If we want to do this, it should go into master branch first and >> backport it 2.26 branch before putting in 2.25 branch. Should >> we do it? > > > Yes, that's the idea. Here is the patch. Tested with GCC 7 on x86-64. OK for master and 2.25/2.26 branches? Thanks. -- H.J. --001a113d12d0f778c205589efaa5 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-Use-static-const-char-domain.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Use-static-const-char-domain.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_j7avst780 Content-length: 1147 RnJvbSBjYjk5YzQxZDI0ZGJiYTk2Nzk3NGFjNmVkM2QxYTIzZGM3ZjY2Y2Zk IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcgMDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiAiSC5KLiBMdSIgPGhq bC50b29sc0BnbWFpbC5jb20+CkRhdGU6IFRodSwgNyBTZXAgMjAxNyAxMzow MjozNiAtMDcwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIFVzZSAic3RhdGljIGNvbnN0 IGNoYXIgZG9tYWluW10gPSIKCgkqIHJlc29sdi90c3QtcmVzb2x2LXF0eXBl cy5jIChkb21haW4pOiBDaGFuZ2VkIHRvCgkiY29uc3QgY2hhciBkb21haW5b XSA9Ii4KLS0tCiByZXNvbHYvdHN0LXJlc29sdi1xdHlwZXMuYyB8IDIgKy0K IDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCAxIGluc2VydGlvbigrKSwgMSBkZWxldGlvbigt KQoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3Jlc29sdi90c3QtcmVzb2x2LXF0eXBlcy5jIGIv cmVzb2x2L3RzdC1yZXNvbHYtcXR5cGVzLmMKaW5kZXggMDZlYTNkYmQxNC4u ZGEzMzI1ZjgwYyAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvcmVzb2x2L3RzdC1yZXNvbHYtcXR5 cGVzLmMKKysrIGIvcmVzb2x2L3RzdC1yZXNvbHYtcXR5cGVzLmMKQEAgLTUw LDcgKzUwLDcgQEAgcmVzcG9uc2UgKGNvbnN0IHN0cnVjdCByZXNvbHZfcmVz cG9uc2VfY29udGV4dCAqY3R4LAogICByZXNvbHZfcmVzcG9uc2VfY2xvc2Vf cmVjb3JkIChiKTsKIH0KIAotc3RhdGljIGNvbnN0IGNoYXIgKiBjb25zdCBk b21haW4gPSAid3d3LmV4YW1wbGUuY29tIjsKK3N0YXRpYyBjb25zdCBjaGFy IGRvbWFpbltdID0gInd3dy5leGFtcGxlLmNvbSI7CiAKIHN0YXRpYyBpbnQK IHdyYXBfcmVzX3F1ZXJ5IChpbnQgdHlwZSwgdW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAqYW5z d2VyLCBpbnQgYW5zd2VyX2xlbmd0aCkKLS0gCjIuMTMuNQoK --001a113d12d0f778c205589efaa5--