From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa1.mentor.iphmx.com (esa1.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.129.153]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11842385220F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:37:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 11842385220F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,182,1665475200"; d="scan'208";a="90469216" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa1.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2022 12:37:23 -0800 IronPort-SDR: GKHzqwHSOf+B+Pt0UpJiuODDXjSjIBgK4jRSYwx2OowJmSaPUJ3iVaIZCuv8IwfqWd3sHGb4u5 1hoiPoXb7+RV0WzbHQnimVpIy8YptC9gYO+EyHOabKFEwHBU2ltmGaR5cA7SXZZO4rusUFVdm6 jpXB1EAnrzJ3URQ835zaCDwXAThSHKIYzpOsFFPnwxwahyTF8vkWyr028k3sdplcMcQ5qr1zfA XQQyM/AIMsXQeY/4/TVR7gO3gp2J6ayfTxJrk3+AsOkdbs0LD3VZacXokKGbYyCZVF3X0+4fmp rI8= Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:37:18 +0000 From: Joseph Myers To: "Andreas K. Huettel" CC: , WANG Xuerui , Subject: Re: Please backport some GCC 13 build fixes In-Reply-To: <111260289.nniJfEyVGO@pinacolada> Message-ID: References: <22430a37-0de8-51f7-0158-356277490dff@gentoo.org> <111260289.nniJfEyVGO@pinacolada> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10) To svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3109.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Andreas K. Huettel via Libc-stable wrote: > > * 3e5760fcb4 ("Update _FloatN header support for C++ in GCC 13") > > * ba70f69598 ("Fix iseqsig for _FloatN and _FloatNx in C++ with GCC 13") > > * f66780ba46 ("Fix build with GCC 13 _FloatN, _FloatNx built-in > > functions") > > FWIW, I added these three commits to our 2.36 and got some FP test failures > requiring distinct changes in ulps. These aren't meant to change the code generated for glibc (with any given GCC version that worked for building glibc before those changes, so GCC 12 or before) at all, so it would be a good idea to investigate why the generated code changed. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com