From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47931 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2018 23:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-stable-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: Sender: libc-stable-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 47912 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2018 23:21:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.99.4 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=month X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: mail-qt0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f170.google.com) (209.85.216.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 23:21:30 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z14so14578303qti.2 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:21:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=axFvXaf9TZaJMcdsOjtj5Om4ZGHYZcxowXoTlv2I/kI=; b=A1al44ZBybTFh1UuannhBF0qFt9tH4UaaOkn206coQEL2X1w5qGjje7uciZNk2xqFW xFWwIp03epBoXn4IGHHx10Z3QofXcCYomRE1E7ZUaorMuX48KOaCZbCVUmSK0B8lFzEp 3JdfO2l9MxLhqHxghFzOc6R35Sj7JKlrsxSDvNea2E5XLqSb2C8RG99AKmROSF9dg+Sz himpYoxYR9xHCRXdof/NX4X1qmDXuyAg24Rm33YJZ7g8h/y4YnQrdGg2X34TV9hsi1ln 7o+TDNHYXLWRLIQ0cus7a26aPsPDz3ippQvQhaB1AwK30GFgAU69ypR+6qF9RgU46c+7 goJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7E6n4Uz6D/2YliZXMHczMoWNK5h5qKEcGnmS0GjmA+x464wSv6q R98m74Sri7fSJJy4Myy1Fx1fjAhdd9M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu3WVmXNtjzqP6BADQJQ4aCP8EmCCKj1z6vmuHtGoNtu4bujVS9BCUeEA0c/7Y9oHLCRpW4KQ== X-Received: by 10.237.50.100 with SMTP id y91mr10784481qtd.327.1521328887990; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.150.73.95] (68.sub-174-237-128.myvzw.com. [174.237.128.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q19sm6223204qta.12.2018.03.17.16.21.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] NEWS: Add entries for bugs: 22848, 22932, 22937, 22963. To: Rafal Luzynski , libc-stable@sourceware.org References: <536621993.23233.1521112750946@poczta.nazwa.pl> <1959649455.23728.1521113032844@poczta.nazwa.pl> <689420158.50213.1521148010464@poczta.nazwa.pl> <708974669.99219.1521236862647@poczta.nazwa.pl> From: Carlos O'Donell Message-ID: Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <708974669.99219.1521236862647@poczta.nazwa.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 On 03/16/2018 03:47 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > 15.03.2018 22:06 Rafal Luzynski wrote: >> >> 15.03.2018 18:39 Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>> >>> On 03/15/2018 05:23 AM, Rafal Luzynski wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> +Major new features: >>>> + >>>> +* As a continuation of the previous work on bug 10871 (supporting >>>> nominative >>>> + and genitive month names) alternative month data have been added for the >>>> + Catalan and Czech language. For the Catalan language the abbreviated >>>> + alternative month name data has been also added. The Greek language >>>> which >>>> + had had alternative month names already has received the abbreviated >>>> + alternative month names. >>> >>> Suggest: >>> >>> * Nominative and genitive month names are now supported for the Catalan and >>> Czech languages. The Catalan and Greek languages now support abbreviated >>> alternative month names. >> >> Thank you Carlos for this review and thank you Joseph for the discussion. >> Is "supported"/"support" the correct word? IIUC this sounds like a new >> software feature while I'm only adding new data. Wouldn't "provided" be >> better, or "added" or "included"? Also I think it would be better to use >> the consequent wording "nominative/genitive" vs. "alternative". >> >> Just please confirm if "supported" is correct. > > Having no answer for this question I am going to push to master exactly > the version suggested by Carlos. We are not in a crunch time so if anything > needs rewording we will have time for this. Unfortunately, I won't have > time to push anything these days except now. Supported is correct. I should have rewritten the whole paragraph for present tense, but what we have is good enough to clearly and succinctly explain what we have done. Always think of the NEWS notice from the user perspective. The user doesn't really care about the difference between "proivded" or "supported", they just want to know that *today* they now have access to these new features. Cheers, Carlos.