From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED4438515D5; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9ED4438515D5 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24J7g5Hb008345; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:04 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g5hqt858b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:03 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24J7gKuZ008787; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:03 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g5hqt8578-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:03 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24J7mlo5018869; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:00 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3g2428whgn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:00 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 24J7nw1O27787638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 May 2022 07:49:58 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647CA11C04C; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239DC11C04A; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.171.44.131] (unknown [9.171.44.131]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2022 07:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 09:49:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: [COMMITTED 2.35] S390: Enable static PIE Content-Language: en-US To: libc-stable@sourceware.org Cc: Adhemerval Zanella , Stefan Liebler via Libc-alpha , Florian Weimer References: <20220428141530.567838-1-stli@linux.ibm.com> <87y1zk70vk.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <760241d4-2f3e-7078-ad98-a4d8ed3fdc69@linaro.org> <87r15b4ubx.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87pmkufx0s.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <25109979-63f6-2a8a-fe19-13bca2f42a6a@linux.ibm.com> <87sfppquw8.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Stefan Liebler In-Reply-To: <87sfppquw8.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: njkRdwZg_L7tZqr0dh6w31YVECYzsvsW X-Proofpoint-GUID: 27md0pHk8b4EbKnCJtl61PG_qDXN8moF X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-19_01,2022-05-17_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=799 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205190046 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-stable@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-stable mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 07:50:09 -0000 On 04/05/2022 15:39, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Stefan Liebler: > >> On 03/05/2022 17:36, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> * Stefan Liebler: >>> >>>> I've just build glibc-HEAD and run the testsuite with >>>> /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space = 0. => Recognized fails as srbk failed. >>>> >>>> Then I've build with Florian's patch series on top. I don't see any >>>> testsuite fails. Furthermore I've debbugged a static testcase into >>>> _dl_early_allocate => mmap was used as result and previous was equal. >>>> >>>> With Florian's patch series also applied, static PIE binaries also run >>>> on an unchanged kernel. >>> >>> That's great. Then I think this means it's safe to enable static PIE >>> for s390x. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Florian >>> >> >> Thanks. Then I'll add some comments regarding your patch-series to >> configure.ac before pushing. >> >> Shall I wait until your patches are committed or is it okay if I push my >> patch before? > > I think in isolation, it might break the Fedora builders and others. > I'll push the three approved patches today and repost the rest later > today. Hopefully we can get this resolved by the end of this week. > > Thanks, > Florian > This commit is now pushed to master and glibc 2.35 release branch (Florian's patch series is also already pushed to the release branch). Thanks, Stefan