From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51359 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2019 04:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51330 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2019 04:07:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HTo:U*libffi-discuss, HX-Languages-Length:722, HX-Spam-Relays-External:ESMTPA X-HELO: smtp01-ext2.udag.de Received: from smtp01-ext2.udag.de (HELO smtp01-ext2.udag.de) (62.146.106.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:07:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.165] (ip5f5bd87a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.91.216.122]) by smtp01-ext2.udag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2E87237 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:07:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: State of Header installation directory ? To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org References: <8bb8c739-6ad6-844e-c497-a9abeafc5ab8@ubuntu.com> From: Marc Ihm Message-ID: <1c7ab9cc-d8ab-87f0-7838-b39e51bc9a4a@ihm.name> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8bb8c739-6ad6-844e-c497-a9abeafc5ab8@ubuntu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: smtp01-ext2.udag.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=ihmname-0001 smtp.mailfrom=marc@ihm.name X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Great ! Thank you. Am 07.10.2019 um 08:12 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 06.10.19 19:42, Marc Ihm wrote: >> Hi, >> >> regarding the discussion about where to install the headers (e.g. >> ffi.h) i am all in favor of targeting /usr/include or another public >> directory. >> >> If I read >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2018/msg00003.html >> >> correctly, this has already been agreed upon. >> >> But still the headers are installed e.g. in >> /usr/local/lib64/libffi-3.2.1/include which cannot be found by e.g. >> configure >> >> So my question: has there been any progress in this matter ? > > this is fixed on the trunk, and in the first 3.3 release candidate.