From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>,
Timothy Wall <twalljava@dev.java.net>,
libffi-discuss@sourceware.org,
Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>,
Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH libffi win64 support
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090616175820.GB1365@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A37C77A.50308@redhat.com>
* Andrew Haley wrote on Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 06:25:30PM CEST:
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:57 AM, NightStrike<nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> configure: error: "libffi has not been ported to x86_64-w64-mingw32."
> >
> > It looks like you might just have to regenerate configure
>
> I did, about five times, and it made no difference. I wonder if there
> might be some autoconf weirdness with timestamps or checksums or somesuch.
autoconf without --force looks at time stamps of input files, yes.
Cheers,
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 17:10 libffi merge Andrew Haley
2009-06-03 11:03 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-03 11:54 ` Anthony Green
2009-06-03 19:53 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-03 20:26 ` Anthony Green
2009-06-04 10:35 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 10:42 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 10:57 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 12:39 ` Anthony Green
2009-06-04 12:49 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 14:09 ` Dave Korn
2009-06-04 14:43 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 15:07 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 15:41 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 16:04 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 16:11 ` Dave Korn
2009-06-04 16:27 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 16:36 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 17:04 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 17:46 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-04 17:26 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-05 12:12 ` Dave Korn
2009-06-05 12:53 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-05 13:03 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-05 13:40 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-05 17:24 ` Andreas Tobler
2009-06-05 17:37 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-06 2:58 ` NightStrike
2009-06-06 8:22 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-07 6:44 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-06-08 16:22 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-08 16:35 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-08 16:54 ` NightStrike
2009-06-08 17:01 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-08 17:58 ` NightStrike
2009-06-08 18:57 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-08 22:21 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-09 15:32 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 16:36 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-09 16:44 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 18:08 ` PATCH libffi testsuite closure fixes Timothy Wall
2009-06-09 18:08 ` PATCH libffi win64 support Timothy Wall
2009-06-10 9:45 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-10 10:54 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-12 14:21 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-12 15:02 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-12 15:08 ` Kai Tietz
2009-06-12 15:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-12 15:23 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-12 15:44 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-12 15:46 ` NightStrike
2009-06-12 15:53 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-12 19:17 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-12 20:03 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-12 20:31 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-16 15:57 ` NightStrike
2009-06-16 16:03 ` NightStrike
2009-06-16 16:26 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-16 17:58 ` Ralf Wildenhues [this message]
2009-06-16 18:20 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-16 19:11 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-06-17 12:36 ` Dave Korn
2009-06-17 12:53 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-17 14:21 ` Dave Korn
2009-06-17 17:51 ` autom4te caching (was: PATCH libffi win64 support) Ralf Wildenhues
2009-06-16 16:31 ` PATCH libffi win64 support Andrew Haley
2009-06-16 17:19 ` NightStrike
2009-06-16 17:37 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-16 17:38 ` NightStrike
2009-06-16 17:42 ` NightStrike
2009-06-16 17:57 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-06-17 2:24 ` NightStrike
2009-06-08 16:48 ` libffi merge NightStrike
2009-06-08 16:50 ` NightStrike
2009-06-08 18:25 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-06-08 18:33 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-08 17:03 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 10:34 ` H.J. Lu
2009-06-09 10:39 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-08 17:16 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 10:16 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 11:45 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-09 12:14 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 14:58 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-09 17:41 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-06-09 15:24 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-05 13:11 ` Dave Korn
2009-06-04 16:29 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-04 17:47 ` Timothy Wall
2009-06-04 17:53 ` Andrew Haley
2009-06-05 12:14 ` Dave Korn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090616175820.GB1365@gmx.de \
--to=ralf.wildenhues@gmx.de \
--cc=Kai.Tietz@onevision.com \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
--cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
--cc=nightstrike@gmail.com \
--cc=twalljava@dev.java.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).