From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libffi-discuss-return-1734-listarch-libffi-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7092 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 12:40:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libffi-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libffi-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 7015 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2013 12:40:13 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_BF autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:40:13 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4MCdwws012886	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 22 May 2013 08:39:58 -0400
Received: from zalov.cz (vpn-63-181.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.63.181])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4MCduYQ014169	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Wed, 22 May 2013 08:39:57 -0400
Received: from zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4MCdsgF017646;	Wed, 22 May 2013 14:39:55 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by zalov.cz (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r4MCdq4q017645;	Wed, 22 May 2013 14:39:52 +0200
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:40:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Cc: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,        "libffi-discuss@sourceware.org" <libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>,        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Unreviewed libffi patch
Message-ID: <20130522123952.GI1377@tucnak.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <yddk3mrtk3k.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <519C96DB.7070703@redhat.com> <CACxje59X_rLcSd7NO1yUNQEjRjeN9hoNkv+FSbA4MNiKxa9FpQ@mail.gmail.com> <yddzjvns084.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yddzjvns084.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SW-Source: 2013/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jakub, what should we do about the 4.8 branch?  Wait until 4.8.1 is
> released or apply now?  This is a regression from 4.7.

You can apply it now.

	Jakub