From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32464 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2014 07:16:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32448 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2014 07:16:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.106) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:53 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:50 -0000 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:47 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2F517D8043 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sAC7Glpj17170794 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:47 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sAC7GlQm012437 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:16:47 -0700 Received: from bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-123.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.123]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sAC7GkxA012430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:16:47 -0700 Received: from dvogt by bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XoSAY-0003vD-C7; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:16:46 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:00 -0000 From: Dominik Vogt To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: libffi 3.2 and disruptive changes Message-ID: <20141112071646.GA14344@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org References: <87wq71yej4.fsf@moxielogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wq71yej4.fsf@moxielogic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14111207-0041-0000-0000-00000214C1F7 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:53:35AM -0500, Anthony Green wrote: > I'd like to move ahead with Richard's proposed changes for GO, complex > types, and the numerous other clean ups he's proposed. Richard proposed fixes for complex types? Can you point me to the messages with these patches please? I must have overlooked them. > msvc builds which are known to be broken. See > https://github.com/atgreen/libffi/issues/138 for details. I've added a lengthy comment to that message report refering to complex support and __STDC_NO_COMPLEX__. That issue needs to be resolved. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany