From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22250 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2014 13:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22228 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2014 13:36:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.113) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:36:00 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:35:56 -0000 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.147) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:35:54 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84992190041 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:35:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sACDZrZB6947190 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:35:53 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sACDZrkk002846 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 06:35:53 -0700 Received: from bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-123.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.123]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sACDZpvj002800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 06:35:52 -0700 Received: from dvogt by bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XoY5P-0007XO-EG; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:35:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:36:00 -0000 From: Dominik Vogt To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal for m*vc build issue (#138) Message-ID: <20141112133551.GA28796@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org References: <20141112130755.GA24721@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54635DAB.3080800@redhat.com> <20141112132624.GA27444@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141112132624.GA27444@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14111213-0029-0000-0000-000001A33E5E X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:26:24PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:16:27PM +0100, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > It might be good to > > > specifically double check the detection of a compiler with complex > > > support using macros. > > > > Looks good to me. > > ... but doesn't work with the gcc I use. I'll check what's going > on. Maybe the no-complex case should generate a warning. Hm, my gcc does not define __STDC_VERSION__ unless called specifically with --std=c99 (or maybe other settings too that I did not check). So the test always thinks that complex types are not available. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany