From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5151 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2014 11:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5055 invoked by uid 89); 18 Nov 2014 11:57:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.110) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:57:54 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:57:51 -0000 Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:57:49 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03651B0804B for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:58:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sAIBvmZC196902 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:57:49 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sAIBvmgx007638 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:57:48 -0700 Received: from bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-122.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.122]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sAIBvm8u007626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:57:48 -0700 Received: from dvogt by bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XqhPn-00026M-QI; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:57:47 +0100 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:57:00 -0000 From: Dominik Vogt To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Merge of gcc patches Message-ID: <20141118115747.GB6497@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org References: <20141118101743.GA26714@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141118102016.GG26714@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <546B2106.3050001@redhat.com> <20141118110617.GA609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <546B2EAA.7020501@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546B2EAA.7020501@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14111811-0017-0000-0000-000001E0E71B X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 11/18/2014 12:06 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > * src/alpha/ffi.c: Do not include stdlib.h. > > But we still do use abort in there. One could argue that perhaps this belongs > in ffi_common.h, but it's not currently included there so I don't see simply > removing it as the right thing to do. Oh, you're right. I didn't make the connection that abort() comes from stdlib.h. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany