From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD543861C77 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:32:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8CD543861C77 Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-113-Zyz-RP8jMjeGFfoklbcdSA-1; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 04:32:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Zyz-RP8jMjeGFfoklbcdSA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id o4-20020a5d47c40000b0290154ad228388so2884638wrc.9 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:32:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z2xWDq7BEA/aSZmENuyYDf8CxWvfkGaDeasJDVc/Qnc=; b=I8EYBpfhtGAieIy6UR5nCvkyJRKAw0clhcx8xEdvZHr8kxUaA6+vmf26FPoNTXd/ZK TzARIPZYJeRry/bt9zu0/iJzAWvcO/ygHyOF2BRTmvzqqd63JlHLX9gLpp6O6nIV6+c5 LbbN1+BApSWnQq83Di5WHCZKgcfozaGSX/a4VZoWovDT0dRdoTCBgtcLXusoiB3JESxo iU4ydBXDUeZzoPoItVdcBqAV4RJtl5P9EyE4CuxHNl2pRB29FTsuF/7yeG/6FI5zvzJK 8UaU7DC/4SbCZgt6qx2BzSVOhVSmixTkHHVXSxWIP4KvVL7Bc68K+o2zIVxPfJY12otk JE/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323ziZllegjh0R4cjuziPfh3to/LqjQb3MCedbQ1fYiZqRYQoni J92ahGwvq9UFVwvL6Cbsg/PZvKLzL2VGUIICp/uBYISsFYyFnFNsa3U4t3KVSYp+DUwHNq5VSG7 96G45Tl+Mg2Pnz2e1WwUrWyMFypUMNAJPtvIlOGkuN5kiZglBTP4onispcgC+M3RQlY31Z/Q= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f8b:: with SMTP id d11mr9421202wru.351.1628238770694; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:32:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiHcJgEgSeDAgD+X/lspJXvEPPCFF58cOVTejR4MV/t5NE7bjVOQ9e+iH/YdCEly0wKUSuEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f8b:: with SMTP id d11mr9421185wru.351.1628238770466; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zarquon.pink (cpc108959-cmbg20-2-0-cust731.5-4.cable.virginm.net. [80.0.22.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q63sm14867718wme.36.2021.08.06.01.32.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 01:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: is fork() supported? To: Jay K , Florian Weimer , DJ Delorie Cc: "libffi-discuss@sourceware.org" References: From: Andrew Haley Message-ID: <479a43a5-a05d-9ece-0b48-cb053f651442@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:32:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libffi-discuss mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 08:32:55 -0000 On 8/5/21 10:21 PM, Jay K wrote: >> The bug that will never die. >  > 1249685 – python-cffi should not require execmem when selinux is enabled (redhat.com) > > I think that is dying soon actually, in as much as libffi is the contributor (based on the title..) What do you mean? That Python will give up using fork() and then ffi? -- Andrew Haley (he/him) Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. https://keybase.io/andrewhaley EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671