From: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch>
To: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jasper@humppa.nl>
Cc: libffi-discuss@sources.redhat.com, Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libffi 3.0.9 release candidate 1
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACA550F.3010701@fgznet.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005180653.GB29614@gurthang.humppa.nl>
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:57:30AM -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
>> Here's 3.0.9rc1:
>> ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/libffi/libffi-3.0.9rc1.tar.gz
>>
>> I built this out of my new git repository here:
>> http://github.com/atgreen/libffi
>>
>> I'm using stgit, which is like quilt for git. I rebased the git
>> repository to gcc HEAD, then added the "stand-alone" patches (mostly
>> configury changes), the AVR port, the Snow Leopard memory protection
>> fix, and the 64-bit AIX fix.
>>
>> I believe we're missing ChangeLog entries from Jens, Abdulaziz, and
>> Bradley. Please send them. I'll push your changes into GCC once
>> they're clean.
>>
>> Abdulaziz - please also check that I applied your patch correctly.
>> The source files had changed somewhat since you submitted it.
>>
>> I'll set up a wiki page to track platform testing soon, but initial
>> test results and pointers to missing patches would be helpful.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> AG
>
> As of this RC, there's an increase of about 340 in failed tests on
> OpenBSD. I've attached the log. The unwindtest.cc failure is expected,
> ther others not. Anyone has a clue what's going on here?
>
> libffi 3.0.8:
> # of expected passes 1365
> # of unexpected failures 8
> # of unsupported tests 15
>
> libffi 3.0.9rc1
> # of expected passes 685
> # of unexpected failures 348
> # of unsupported tests 15
Could you try to copy the testcases from 3.0.8 (maybe even 3.0.7) to
3.0.9rc1 and rerun the testsuite?
I encounter similar failures on FreeBSD sparc64 and amd64. Copying the
testcases from an older libffi release to the 3.0.9rc1 brings everthing
back in PASS land here. (with gcc-4.2.x)
Well, that is not the solution, just a first step to isolate the issue.
In the meantime I try to find out what is going on, I guess MMAP vs.
ffi_closure_alloc is the starting point to investigate.
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 4:57 Anthony Green
2009-10-05 18:07 ` Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
2009-10-05 18:08 ` Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
2009-10-05 18:21 ` Anthony Green
2009-10-05 18:23 ` Anthony Green
2009-10-05 18:29 ` Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
2009-10-05 20:01 ` Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
2009-10-05 18:25 ` Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
2009-10-05 20:21 ` Andreas Tobler [this message]
2009-10-05 20:31 ` Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
2009-10-05 20:36 ` Andreas Tobler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACA550F.3010701@fgznet.ch \
--to=andreast-list@fgznet.ch \
--cc=green@redhat.com \
--cc=jasper@humppa.nl \
--cc=libffi-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).