From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libffi-discuss-return-1175-listarch-libffi-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 476 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2011 03:55:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 468 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2011 03:55:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BF
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from dm-mail01.mozilla.org (HELO dm-mail01.mozilla.org) (63.245.208.150)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:55:38 +0000
Received: from Rafael-Avila-de-Espindolas-MacBook-Air.local (v74-nslb.mozilla.org [10.2.74.4])	(Authenticated sender: respindola@mozilla.com)	by dm-mail01.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA62DB8007	for <libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D8EB535.2050804@mozilla.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:55:00 -0000
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rafael_=C1vila_de_Esp=EDndola?= <respindola@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Check for libffi_cv_as_x86_pcrel should not look for just "warning"
References: <4D4C62FE.4070409@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D4C62FE.4070409@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libffi-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libffi-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2

Ping.

FYI, this is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631928

On 11-02-04 3:35 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote:
> The check that sets libffi_cv_as_x86_pcrel currently check for "warning"
> or "illegal". The problem is that when trying to build libffi with LTO
> clang will produce the warning
>
> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-emit-llvm'
>
> The attached patch just uses the $CC error code instead. Is that OK or
> is there some strange assembler out there that rejects the assembly bug
> exists with 0?

Cheers,
Rafael