From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11529 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2014 11:34:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11519 invoked by uid 89); 18 Nov 2014 11:34:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:34:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAIBY7x0017152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:34:07 -0500 Received: from pike.twiddle.home (vpn1-5-51.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.51]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAIBY4IW005250 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:34:06 -0500 Message-ID: <546B2EAA.7020501@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:34:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Merge of gcc patches References: <20141118101743.GA26714@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141118102016.GG26714@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <546B2106.3050001@redhat.com> <20141118110617.GA609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20141118110617.GA609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2 On 11/18/2014 12:06 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > * src/alpha/ffi.c: Do not include stdlib.h. But we still do use abort in there. One could argue that perhaps this belongs in ffi_common.h, but it's not currently included there so I don't see simply removing it as the right thing to do. r~