From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21853 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2015 21:34:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21842 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jan 2015 21:34:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:34:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t05LYbTB011344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:34:37 -0500 Received: from anchor.twiddle.net (vpn-227-136.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.227.136]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t05LYarG004980; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:34:36 -0500 Message-ID: <54AB036B.4030104@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:34:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: u-xsnf@aetey.se CC: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: showstopper bug on x86 (Re: libffi does not follow proper ABI on ia32) References: <20141222193538.GW14316@example.net> <20141224135825.GF14316@example.net> <549AEA51.2000500@redhat.com> <54A4207F.9090904@redhat.com> <20150102185653.GO14316@example.net> <54A719A6.9050008@redhat.com> <20150103101457.GP14316@example.net> In-Reply-To: <20150103101457.GP14316@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On 01/03/2015 02:14 AM, u-xsnf@aetey.se wrote: > Is it hard to make libffi implementation compatible with cdecl? > The calling conventions is exactly what the library is competent about. I guess it wasn't that hard. See https://github.com/atgreen/libffi/pull/165 r~