From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27664 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2015 01:13:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27597 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2015 01:13:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:13:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0D1DWXp002807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:13:32 -0500 Received: from pike.twiddle.home (vpn-56-3.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.56.3]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0D1DU2g023163; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:13:31 -0500 Message-ID: <54B47138.1090307@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:13:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: Anthony Green , GCC Patches , libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: libffi is broken for x32 References: <54B466EE.70204@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On 01/12/2015 04:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > The problem is my x86_64-*-linux-gnux32 patch > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01083.html > > was never accepted upstream. Can I apply it to config.guess > in GCC? Ah. Hmm. Perhaps the configure.host patch would be better after all. r~