From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59590 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2015 16:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 59568 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2015 16:29:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:29:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D10EB2CAB0F; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pike.twiddle.home (unused [10.10.50.54] (may be forged)) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3OGSxEn021834; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:28:59 -0400 Message-ID: <553A6F4A.9040409@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:29:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell Keith-Magee CC: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Questions about the libffi development process References: <553692BE.2070306@redhat.com> <55394442.9020701@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On 04/23/2015 03:49 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > None at all? There's no release candidate process? No release testing > procedures? I Anthony will have to answer that. > libtool: compile: xcrun -sdk iphoneos clang -arch armv7 > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I../include -Iinclude -I../src -I. > -I../include -Iinclude -I../src -miphoneos-version-min=7.0 -MT > src/arm/sysv.lo -MD -MP -MF src/arm/.deps/sysv.Tpo -c > ../src/arm/sysv.S -fno-common -DPIC -o src/arm/.libs/sysv.o > ../src/arm/sysv.S:111:2: error: .arch directive not valid for Mach-O > .arch armv5t Any chance you know what is the base architecture for iOS on ARM? > ../src/arm/sysv.S:128:8: error: invalid operand for instruction > ldcle p11, cr0, [r0] @ vldrle d0, [sp] > ^ Try replacing these with the comment (text after @) and see if it assembles. The generic "coprocessor load" instructions are used instead of the more specific vfp load instructions in order to support armv7hf at run-time while not requiring more than arm5t at compile-time. Something that makes sense for ELF, but I guess not for iOS. r~