From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de (einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de [217.197.80.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB5A33857C5C for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:41:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org EB5A33857C5C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ubuntu.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=doko@ubuntu.com X-Envelope-From: doko@ubuntu.com Received: from authenticated.user (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de with ESMTPSA id 0ABEesYB016917 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:40:55 +0100 Subject: Re: Another libffi ABI change and another release To: Tom Tromey , Anthony Green Cc: libffi-discuss , s.mesoraca16@gmail.com, "H.J. Lu" References: <871rqjmv05.fsf@tromey.com> From: Matthias Klose Message-ID: <66fda637-0b0a-6355-28ae-701ea27d97c9@ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:40:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <871rqjmv05.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libffi-discuss mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:41:16 -0000 On 2/25/20 12:21 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Green writes: > > Anthony> I just thought I'd float this idea in case anyone has any pending urgent > Anthony> changes. I'd like to get a new release out so we can upgrade the libffi in > Anthony> Fedora (which so far has not published the .7 version). > > I don't know if there are urgent ones (certainly I don't have anything > written) but I think a while back there was a thread about a wish-list > for ABI breaks. But perhaps if we're breaking ABI now, it could be done > again in the future. May I ping again about a release, or just saying that you are not planning for a release? Thanks, Matthias