From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13031 invoked by alias); 29 May 2017 15:30:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12979 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2017 15:30:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*tom, Hx-languages-length:397, Ltd, ltd X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:30:50 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67FC15F7B6; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:30:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 67FC15F7B6 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aph@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 67FC15F7B6 Received: from zebedee.pink (unknown [10.40.205.45]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6157F474; Mon, 29 May 2017 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Cosure return value issue on Linux PPC64 To: Tom Tromey , "Kaz Kylheku (libffi)" <382-725-6798@kylheku.com> Cc: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org References: <53985e874a349c551e7943677d21c766@mail.kylheku.com> <8737bnetf4.fsf@bapiya> From: Andrew Haley Message-ID: <7d4ea836-9d86-884b-2315-d0055f050da8@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8737bnetf4.fsf@bapiya> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 On 29/05/17 13:31, Tom Tromey wrote: > I hope this helps, but if it's still insufficiently clear, I'd > appreciate suggestions for how to improve it. A couple of examples would help. I find that wordage confusing. -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671