From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23043 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2014 15:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23029 invoked by uid 89); 28 Mar 2014 15:43:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qa0-f44.google.com Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.216.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:43:44 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id dc16so565350qab.3 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:43:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=KLv5c3eI5f4GjKTv7vrsnllrrmIyMTtpBZQ4zTbiEjo=; b=dvWHvOkfid3Ly+quhFVz24AWoAcrsVkylhmCzjmJXiftUy2QhTzQJ0T6ixHfRnYQPa 6A6M5dPUK9NNXUNmhWxv3ZlUqmbCLyuoYUE0++Vg8uMOum0tLyuDymi/gnpFVKSdH3tI eUaJvz3rdpsE4Rm5u69/kZ+HoNTkr9ChnsYJu2tyEp9N4UMqPjfkEBp8K8rFDLW+Hijw JDROd5FNZwQKzQ6LUYfn4ZiuJJRBLww6f/0neaQOfDrO0WlIyNjDMJxQ2EuaHZWDq214 OIsydgqITpVOeCVeg2VlbbDkz7x0pB6YjUmTpTZuqGT9qQjzzvQj8FAHM1MaekBkMaNT cdWw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlFRyjcUoIAXh0SI9HX5pbBrtCaBya8SAA8DyGnVQCu3Plv0o7p6n9bijnROObiKokqhoI2 X-Received: by 10.224.167.80 with SMTP id p16mr10263275qay.62.1396021422402; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([207.112.112.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a10sm10758567qas.6.2014.03.28.08.43.40 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:43:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthony Green To: Samuli Suominen Cc: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: libffi 3.1-rc1 needs testing! References: <87eh2liiow.fsf@moxielogic.com> <87a9ce3ry7.fsf@moxielogic.com> <53341E7D.1020408@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <53341E7D.1020408@gentoo.org> (Samuli Suominen's message of "Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:50:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87a9ca8h2p.fsf@moxielogic.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 Samuli Suominen writes: > On 25/03/14 23:10, Anthony Green wrote: >> It's here: ftp://sourceware.org/pub/libffi/libffi-3.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> > > Another missing patch from the release: Thanks Samuli. I am applying both patches. AG > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2014/msg00028.html > > It's an important one, at least for distributions building for multiple > different arch's (like 32bit vs. 64bit) > at the same time, important for eg. Gentoo's libffi > Otherwise flags like eg. -m32 will be skipped and > -print-multi-os-directory gives wrong value