From: Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: segfault in ffi_data_to_code_pointer
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o92fs3d2.fsf@laptop.atgreen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xntvcct6b0.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (DJ Delorie's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:55:47 -0400")
Hi DJ,
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
> In src/closures.c, ffi_data_to_code_pointer() calls segment_holding()
> to get a pointer to the code segment for a data segment. It doesn't
> check for a NULL return, and I've got a test case where I run Ruby's
> test suite (on a non-selinux aarch64 machine, if that matters) and
> segment_holding() returns NULL and much hilarity ensues.
This suggests that the ffi_closure object used to invoke
ffi_data_to_code_pointer wasn't allocated by ffi_closure_alloc(). Is
that something you can check?
Thanks,
AG
>
> The following patch fixes the segfault, but I don't know if
> segment_holding() returning NULL is an expected case, or a symptom of
> problems elsewhere?
>
>> diff -rup a/src/closures.c b/src/closures.c
>> --- a/src/closures.c 2019-06-25 21:21:06.738743440 -0400
>> +++ b/src/closures.c 2019-06-25 21:22:00.769716129 -0400
>> @@ -621,7 +621,10 @@ void *
>> ffi_data_to_code_pointer (void *data)
>> {
>> msegmentptr seg = segment_holding (gm, data);
>> - return add_segment_exec_offset (data, seg);
>> + if (seg)
>> + return add_segment_exec_offset (data, seg);
>> + else
>> + return data;
>> }
--
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Senior Principal Solutions Architect, Financial Services
+1 647 477-3809
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-30 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 20:55 DJ Delorie
2019-06-30 11:46 ` Anthony Green [this message]
2019-07-02 23:47 ` DJ Delorie
2019-07-03 22:28 ` DJ Delorie
2019-07-03 22:47 ` Anthony Green
2019-07-03 22:54 ` DJ Delorie
2019-07-03 23:14 ` Anthony Green
2019-07-04 0:19 ` DJ Delorie
2019-07-04 12:35 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o92fs3d2.fsf@laptop.atgreen.org \
--to=green@redhat.com \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).