From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105232 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2016 13:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 105200 invoked by uid 89); 27 Oct 2016 13:09:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Klose, klose, U*doko, dokoubuntucom X-HELO: mail-lf0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f42.google.com) (209.85.215.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:08:58 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b75so30380502lfg.3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Gt5fGNcW4EHmDjinnjgX2JXy7J3swdWXEAwOTkEo0ww=; b=Txae1/pglBKkVlXr8YcSnqDWzO6eexcSyH4YsaX9DvRnQKqoOn/EJSZFBJX2JxKYtF CW0+OZ3PGwtw6Cmi+CrgNlCL3bd7blw8ZTF8VIOvTqGVc2VpvPLbMLh3JK0TfpOXLXcK 9WYbD7Jd3Mir/nDccV+2VL7ULjfYrY8uHcqhqstcOHR1GzprBPnTDOJyESUcXt6+hp6G dSJ0pswnCjLwAx/Bo9Ndr+HtSdiwgQ/b+xImV1I2x8x2mQ0qjB/vnF1HDjh13b0bqnwd t+wkAbU3F7VgJbH23LAhbqeq5OminItwGYYUiZyJfUGiS1f3MPvj1ysg2jcATscvxjuP iqcw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvduim0JRkZASBMPU0KwVdVjObCj05MPDWa+d+n+vqtpRQ+ojjNt7mg4G1nJjzXeLQ59XZKpPvBrFm8/mA== X-Received: by 10.25.169.146 with SMTP id s140mr5363940lfe.24.1477573735393; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.210.78 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:08:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48a433ca-9f6d-3b5b-9485-64261d812b66@ubuntu.com> References: <48a433ca-9f6d-3b5b-9485-64261d812b66@ubuntu.com> From: Anthony Green Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: libffi maintenance within GCC? To: Matthias Klose Cc: gcc Development , "libffi-discuss@sourceware.org" , Ian Lance Taylor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 Is it still important that libffi be included in the GCC tree? AG On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > With the removal of libgcj, the only user of libffi in GCC is libgo, however > there is now no maintainer listed anymore for libffi in the MAINTAINERS file, > and the libffi subdir is a bit outdated compared to the libffi upstream > repository (got aware of this by libffi issue #197). Who would be responsible > now to update / review libffi patches, just the global reviewers, or should > libffi be maintained by the libgo maintainers? > > Matthias