public inbox for libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell Keith-Magee <russell@keith-magee.com>
To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Questions about the libffi development process
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 06:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJxq849SA-pRuNZpENhrJHQdtW+LVD-Pr988j0jWuNVpLTo0Zg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I've got 2 questions about the libffi development process.

1. A recent commit:

https://github.com/atgreen/libffi/commit/a4b785ea

(authored by Richard Henderson) appears to have broken ARMv7 support
to the point where libffi doesn't build. (Or, at least, it raises a
syntax error on iOS - but I can't see any reason the same problem
wouldn't exist for other ARM platforms).

The problem has been logged as #181:

https://github.com/atgreen/libffi/issues/181

Unfortunately, I don't have the expertise to fix this problem myself,
and it's not clear from the discussion that the problem has been
acknowledged by anyone in a position to fix it, or that it will be
considered a release blocking bug for a future release.

Is there anything I can/should do to bring attention to this problem
and/or mark it as a showstopper (other than what has already been done
on the ticket and in this email)?

2. I can see the version number in the README was bumped to 4 just
after the 3.2.1 release - but what is the state of planning around a
formal v4 release (or whatever the next version will be)? Is there a
vague target date? A TODO list to be cleared off? Or just general
"whenever it's ready" guidance?

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

             reply	other threads:[~2015-04-18  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-18  6:29 Russell Keith-Magee [this message]
2015-04-21 18:11 ` Richard Henderson
2015-04-23  8:25   ` Russell Keith-Magee
2015-04-23 19:13     ` Richard Henderson
2015-04-24  1:49       ` Russell Keith-Magee
2015-04-24 16:29         ` Richard Henderson
2015-04-25 11:15           ` Russell Keith-Magee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJxq849SA-pRuNZpENhrJHQdtW+LVD-Pr988j0jWuNVpLTo0Zg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=russell@keith-magee.com \
    --cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).