From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libffi-discuss-return-2150-listarch-libffi-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25582 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2015 15:35:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libffi-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libffi-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 25555 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2015 15:35:37 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f176.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:35:35 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id vb8so3064327obc.7        for <libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:35:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.134.200 with SMTP id pm8mr11285596oeb.61.1421163333658; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:35:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.185.7 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:35:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54B47138.1090307@redhat.com>
References: <CAMe9rOpTqX-d+CoSnxqug__gYv1HVZ8+6-KBqQ8fWo9+sH07Cg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOp5jCwZ548gNjdO7S6MenRLM1W-5q-KDOFOzuKhb_Zt=Q@mail.gmail.com>	<54B466EE.70204@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOpWdSeCvxRWiiwYbA7R7dNqtReFig=7vYJREzEBO6dD+w@mail.gmail.com>	<54B47138.1090307@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrh1ejfhg7hNE7OPFR2P8FnWWLSMSe9E1C9Vmi7jkRZtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: libffi is broken for x32
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 04:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> The problem is my x86_64-*-linux-gnux32 patch
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01083.html
>>
>> was never accepted upstream.  Can I apply it to config.guess
>> in GCC?
>
> Ah.  Hmm.  Perhaps the configure.host patch would be better after all.
>

Can I apply it to GCC trunk?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.