From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E993864858
 for <libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:25:28 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 01E993864858
Received: from [192.168.254.38] (unknown [47.187.206.220])
 by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DA9420B7178;
 Sun, 27 Sep 2020 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 8DA9420B7178
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
 kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
 libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, luto@kernel.org, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM,
 mark.rutland@arm.com, mic@digikod.net, pavel@ucw.cz
References: <20200916150826.5990-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <87v9gdz01h.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <96ea02df-4154-5888-1669-f3beeed60b33@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20200923014616.GA1216401@rani.riverdale.lan>
 <20200923091125.GB1240819@rani.riverdale.lan>
 <a742b9cd-4ffb-60e0-63b8-894800009700@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20200923195147.GA1358246@rani.riverdale.lan>
 <2ed2becd-49b5-7e76-9836-6a43707f539f@linux.microsoft.com>
 <87o8luvqw9.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <3fe7ba84-b719-b44d-da87-6eda60543118@linux.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <fdfe73d3-d735-4bdc-4790-7feb7fecece5@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 13:25:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3fe7ba84-b719-b44d-da87-6eda60543118@linux.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,
 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libffi-discuss mailing list <libffi-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libffi-discuss>,
 <mailto:libffi-discuss-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libffi-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libffi-discuss-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libffi-discuss>,
 <mailto:libffi-discuss-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:25:29 -0000

Before I implement the user land solution recommended by reviewers, I just want
an opinion on where the code should reside.

I am thinking glibc. The other choice would be a separate library, say, libtramp.
What do you recommend?

Madhavan