From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libffi-discuss-return-1735-listarch-libffi-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11616 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 12:45:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libffi-discuss.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libffi-discuss-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libffi-discuss-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libffi-discuss-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 11570 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2013 12:45:31 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_BF autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:45:30 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1])	by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A48D5FE;	Wed, 22 May 2013 14:45:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id 4Qa0ArnXUwAQ; Wed, 22 May 2013 14:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.110])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246A85FD;	Wed, 22 May 2013 14:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from ro@localhost)	by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id r4MCjQqs003337;	Wed, 22 May 2013 14:45:26 +0200 (MEST)
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,        "libffi-discuss\@sourceware.org" <libffi-discuss@sourceware.org>,        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Unreviewed libffi patch
References: <yddk3mrtk3k.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>	<519C96DB.7070703@redhat.com>	<CACxje59X_rLcSd7NO1yUNQEjRjeN9hoNkv+FSbA4MNiKxa9FpQ@mail.gmail.com>	<yddzjvns084.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>	<20130522123952.GI1377@tucnak.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:45:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20130522123952.GI1377@tucnak.redhat.com> (Jakub Jelinek's	message of "Wed, 22 May 2013 14:39:52 +0200")
Message-ID: <yddobc3rxnd.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Jakub, what should we do about the 4.8 branch?  Wait until 4.8.1 is
>> released or apply now?  This is a regression from 4.7.
>
> You can apply it now.

Done, thanks.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University