public inbox for libstdc++-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc(refs/vendors/ARM/heads/arm-struct-reorg-wip)] libstdc++: test for failing assertion should use 'run' not 'compile'
@ 2020-07-17 13:17 Tamar Christina
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tamar Christina @ 2020-07-17 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs, libstdc++-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4735f92d48c373031be296fd0f7a2cf31fc955da
commit 4735f92d48c373031be296fd0f7a2cf31fc955da
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 28 17:05:45 2020 +0000
libstdc++: test for failing assertion should use 'run' not 'compile'
And it only needs to define _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS not _GLIBCXX_DEBUG.
* testsuite/24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc: Run
test instead of just compiling it.
Diff:
---
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
.../24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
index 0feef87cce6..98eaff92fd1 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-02-28 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
+
+ * testsuite/24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc: Run
+ test instead of just compiling it.
+
2020-02-28 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
* include/std/ranges (reverse_view::_S_needs_cached_begin): Set to false
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc
index ffda650fb0a..7a1ef97df14 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/range_operations/advance_debug_neg.cc
@@ -15,8 +15,9 @@
// with this library; see the file COPYING3. If not see
// <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
-// { dg-options "-std=gnu++2a -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG" }
-// { dg-do compile { xfail c++2a } }
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++2a -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS" }
+// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
+// { dg-require-effective-target c++2a }
#include <iterator>
#include <testsuite_iterators.h>
@@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ test01()
auto iter = c.begin();
std::ranges::advance(iter, -1);
}
+
+int main()
+{
+ test01();
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-07-17 13:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-17 13:17 [gcc(refs/vendors/ARM/heads/arm-struct-reorg-wip)] libstdc++: test for failing assertion should use 'run' not 'compile' Tamar Christina
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).