public inbox for libstdc++-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc r11-10236] libstdc++: Make std::string_view(Range&&) constructor explicit Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:57:05 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220905095705.6FF5F3858D32@sourceware.org> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c6141bfec48c2bb92c6846d78589996ff62e4b2 commit r11-10236-g9c6141bfec48c2bb92c6846d78589996ff62e4b2 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> Date: Thu Aug 4 13:08:00 2022 +0100 libstdc++: Make std::string_view(Range&&) constructor explicit The P2499R0 paper was recently approved for C++23. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/string_view (basic_string_view(Range&&)): Add explicit as per P2499R0. * testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/char/range_c++20.cc: Adjust implicit conversions. Check implicit conversions fail. * testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/range_c++20.cc: Likewise. (cherry picked from commit 2678386df2cc3505da85e95643327aa928e66a8e) Diff: --- libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view | 2 +- .../basic_string_view/cons/char/range_c++20.cc | 28 +++++++++++++++++--- .../basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/range_c++20.cc | 30 ++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view index d8cbee9bee0..68df70e99f1 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION }) && (!requires { typename _DRange::traits_type; } || is_same_v<typename _DRange::traits_type, _Traits>) - constexpr + constexpr explicit basic_string_view(_Range&& __r) noexcept(noexcept(ranges::size(__r)) && noexcept(ranges::data(__r))) : _M_len(ranges::size(__r)), _M_str(ranges::data(__r)) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/char/range_c++20.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/char/range_c++20.cc index fa85f1994c9..c95239c613b 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/char/range_c++20.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/char/range_c++20.cc @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ test01() }; R r; - std::string_view s = r; + std::string_view s{r}; VERIFY( s == r.str ); VERIFY( s.data() == std::ranges::data(r) ); VERIFY( s.size() == std::ranges::size(r) ); @@ -50,10 +50,15 @@ test01() static_assert( std::ranges::contiguous_range<R2> ); static_assert( std::ranges::sized_range<R2> ); R2 r2; - std::string_view s2 = r2; // uses conversion to string_view + std::string_view s2(r2); // uses conversion to string_view VERIFY( s2 == "Out of range" ); VERIFY( std::string_view(const_cast<const R2&>(r2)) == s2 ); + // And again using copy-initialization instead of direct-initialization. + std::string_view s2_implicit = r2; // uses conversion to string_view + VERIFY( s2_implicit == "Out of range" ); + VERIFY( std::string_view(const_cast<const R2&>(r2)) == s2_implicit ); + struct R3 : R { using R::begin; @@ -91,7 +96,7 @@ test01() static_assert( std::ranges::contiguous_range<R5> ); static_assert( std::ranges::sized_range<R5> ); R5 r5; - std::string_view s5 = r5; // Uses range constructor + std::string_view s5(r5); // Uses range constructor VERIFY( s5 == r5.str ); s5 = std::string_view(std::move(r5)); // In C++20 this used conversion op. VERIFY( s5 == r5.str ); // In C++23 it uses range constructor. @@ -156,15 +161,30 @@ test04() }; R r; - std::basic_string_view s = r; // Use deduction guide. + std::basic_string_view s(r); // Use deduction guide. static_assert( std::is_same_v<decltype(s), std::string_view> ); } +void +test05() +{ + struct R + { + const char* begin() const { return nullptr; } + const char* end() const { return nullptr; } + }; + + // P2499R0 string_view range constructor should be explicit + // P2516R0 string_view is implicitly convertible from what? + static_assert( ! std::is_convertible_v<R, std::string_view> ); +} + int main() { test01(); test02(); test03(); test04(); + test05(); } diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/range_c++20.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/range_c++20.cc index cf73ae36a60..2144ca49e77 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/range_c++20.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/range_c++20.cc @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ test01() }; R r; - std::wstring_view s = r; + std::wstring_view s{r}; VERIFY( s == r.str ); VERIFY( s.data() == std::ranges::data(r) ); VERIFY( s.size() == std::ranges::size(r) ); @@ -50,10 +50,15 @@ test01() static_assert( std::ranges::contiguous_range<R2> ); static_assert( std::ranges::sized_range<R2> ); R2 r2; - std::wstring_view s2 = r2; // uses conversion to wstring_view + std::wstring_view s2(r2); // uses conversion to wstring_view VERIFY( s2 == L"Out of range" ); VERIFY( std::wstring_view(const_cast<const R2&>(r2)) == s2 ); + // And again using copy-initialization instead of direct-initialization. + std::wstring_view s2_implicit = r2; // uses conversion to wstring_view + VERIFY( s2_implicit == L"Out of range" ); + VERIFY( std::wstring_view(const_cast<const R2&>(r2)) == s2_implicit ); + struct R3 : R { using R::begin; @@ -91,10 +96,10 @@ test01() static_assert( std::ranges::contiguous_range<R5> ); static_assert( std::ranges::sized_range<R5> ); R5 r5; - std::wstring_view s5 = r5; // Uses range constructor + std::wstring_view s5(r5); // Uses range constructor VERIFY( s5 == r5.str ); s5 = std::wstring_view(std::move(r5)); // In C++20 this used conversion op. - VERIFY( s5 == r5.str ); // In C++23 it uses range constructor. + VERIFY( s5 == r5.str ); // In C++23 it uses range constructor. wchar_t arr[] = L"arrangement\0with\0nulls"; std::wstring_view sa = arr; // Does not use range constructor @@ -156,15 +161,30 @@ test04() }; R r; - std::basic_string_view s = r; // Use deduction guide. + std::basic_string_view s(r); // Use deduction guide. static_assert( std::is_same_v<decltype(s), std::wstring_view> ); } +void +test05() +{ + struct R + { + const wchar_t* begin() const { return nullptr; } + const wchar_t* end() const { return nullptr; } + }; + + // P2499R0 string_view range constructor should be explicit + // P2516R0 string_view is implicitly convertible from what? + static_assert( ! std::is_convertible_v<R, std::wstring_view> ); +} + int main() { test01(); test02(); test03(); test04(); + test05(); }
reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 9:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220905095705.6FF5F3858D32@sourceware.org \ --to=redi@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=libstdc++-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).