From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DFB3858C27 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:30:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D5DFB3858C27 Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id k10so874207wmi.3 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 05:30:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=F4BIbFHQR9GFj8wjCpGgAOCUVZN+w6em0d5fb28pIx8=; b=nAxb6OwOQJTkET7tV3HxcSXo8f8L74Icf+WXVfUikbQjJFSnR4eMpxuJnV7a/1a8E/ tL2Q1jxwMXWhklcVA3gqK26jLf40GRiQ+3TY8Z6I04fhCbdeXn8ZwB+rZ1Z+dzmSWT/S vAo2ad63d4GvALRPNSiWvC5XzoYFiue5EuWhFQIdktPfj1c80l4yHJUlrFdmS1+V5xwN 5uNMOPNObguTaIbO+QCifi/Zt1+KCT+CEA9RsXEq62qxFA5p6T82wdAYqFvpKEM8a03M vTbGKJomS00JZBmMMPAmjRM0Kr/tQ4P9NxElfkgtUqXQ11AXspqRVmfYR8/qcqJ4Orvf Du0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530p5OFaX59NOq3qo8gFQhunQrd0CxR9MN1JyNlWXW5xN+vgT3gR 4I6IUGXdKTH85Aw0Ep6L44dZV8vXWqO2Tg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLBsh5Wkzf6SUVgG2M+c8kUYS4uGOT1jRadEGrv+PDoHTsLMy4jv4S1YktkDBmD0CHJblRVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb82:: with SMTP id m2mr14014873wmi.75.1606570226571; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 05:30:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e0a:1dc:b1c0:536:5be:297c:9b40? ([2a01:e0a:1dc:b1c0:536:5be:297c:9b40]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w5sm14968368wrm.29.2020.11.28.05.30.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Nov 2020 05:30:25 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: transparent proxy of string_view as key for associative containers. To: Ville Voutilainen Cc: libstdc++ References: <20201116095723.GP503596@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Dumont?= Message-ID: <074322f1-1c5b-8452-2d61-1950167f57f1@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:30:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libstdc++ mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:30:30 -0000 On 28/11/20 12:17 pm, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 at 13:02, François Dumont via Libstdc++ > wrote: >> Hi >> >> Just for information I am starting the work on this following this >> paper: http://wg21.link/p1690r1 > Thanks for the heads-up, because I was about to start doing that. All > yours, go ahead, I'll hack on something else. > > I took a brief look at this, and we basically need to add the > templated overloads all the way down to the hash table, > but other than that, there doesn't seem to be anything too tedious in this. Yes, this is why I plan to give it a try :-) And also because I think it is interesting to do so before continuing on PR96088: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-October/051255.html