From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42A6938533ED for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:30:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 42A6938533ED Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670862637; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TJtrIq9Z17rkvzKfthwzTHgBwxbJ7xKSLnQnVWgshts=; b=BPpzMJPBOf2vaC8YCzf/ri8aTQF8eAKdLgVoCtLnY7jUQPXmIhPbeb32n8vwxGE+zDU4HV 6gNUw26yJ8x8YXRYSaKYwo5Q0jtFdyLstpxIRFDxRz2fUfpXPN6CyMMtd7i/Ruv0X34Lke WUCJVBfpaodiN+02DT9uyckRuknVUwE= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-626-U7DVYaIGPU6BiLj3rXBFIQ-1; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:30:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: U7DVYaIGPU6BiLj3rXBFIQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ga21-20020a1709070c1500b007c171be7cd7so1846406ejc.20 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:30:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TJtrIq9Z17rkvzKfthwzTHgBwxbJ7xKSLnQnVWgshts=; b=NIK870hjg0JcMPuNJfSboyVYWq8wck4lXzVzNI0xQ2+l5rAobNF9gwaxJy+sHPkDJu mElOn7QQ7VDRF0fcPKjfiUplnYLkaHRFAeaxuyfb35g9TnUm0gcMQp4Dfdpk8mMUPTbe Ooji1ZU51LK5DXTlG6K7+AaU7KIlTgBk1H4z8OA3dU+nEofiKKmfiZy+vA7iCug9kgnU sbsrt5BGvheZa6dHoKnVsjgGdCMuJR4Dz5/fmM8nGtozDj5t84WUPf9clzDjYTWvz9CX xkfkJDCrWeoy7K+zBRnwakbESbzGIW5bt7JDEs9OvKjVhNsUPHwpYg5dBskLT29gLAsP YDVg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmgGF2ibRH0yoCI/OZZVZBd2oF9yFP96At/eR3B4vujVOK2oqEF xV0R/RyNd4ot2shUbulJ4kwSYZZ59uALZ+TuyRGKgH1bDDSdWzYMpq7L2VSScgoSYcz3qipma1t JCOBOAdMugx0o+Iw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c716:b0:7c0:e7a7:50b with SMTP id ty22-20020a170907c71600b007c0e7a7050bmr15202631ejc.48.1670862635586; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:30:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7VEbaMqvGBKnj4rn6ji8Ny23OIW9paLnYyeduatYjzoPOEUXmQl7iroe8wtKEtnpY4phsPWQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c716:b0:7c0:e7a7:50b with SMTP id ty22-20020a170907c71600b007c0e7a7050bmr15202618ejc.48.1670862635289; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:30:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.188.47] (dynamic-095-112-158-023.95.112.pool.telefonica.de. [95.112.158.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i9-20020a056402054900b00463c5c32c6esm3956798edx.89.2022.12.12.08.30.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:30:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <088e7473-cfcc-b1b5-ad69-4e36a62e76b0@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:30:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Make chrono::hh_mm_ss more compact To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, Jonathan Wakely References: <20221121204341.2024118-1-jwakely@redhat.com> <39dc640b-e46d-8694-8056-7792127a97c8@redhat.com> From: Stephan Bergmann In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 12/12/2022 12:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > If Clang already treats __is_signed as a conditionally-active > built-in, it should do the same for __is_unsigned. Wasn't aware of that special handling of __is_signed. Filed "Also allow __is_unsigned to be used as an identifier" now (just in case, even if the use in libstdc++ is already gone again).