Re: [PING] [PATCH] libstdc++: Pretty printers for std::_Bit_reference, std::_Bit_iterator and std::_Bit_const_iterator

[Michael Weghorn <m.weghorn@posteo.de>]

On 01/12/2020 22.37, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 27/11/20 16:33 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 25/11/20 15:05 +0100, Michael Weghorn via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>> I'd like to ping for this patch:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553870.html
>>
>> Thanks, I'll take another look next week.
> 
> I've applied the patch now, thanks.
> 
> I adjusted it slightly, to add a test for const_iterator to the C++98
> test, simple.cc, consistent with the C++11 one, simple11.cc

Thanks!

> 
> Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
> 
> Thanks again for the patch, and your patience.
> 
> 
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2020 19.22, Michael Weghorn via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>> On 22/09/2020 12.04, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>> On 14/09/20 16:49 +0200, Michael Weghorn via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the attached patch implements pretty printers relevant for iteration
>>>>>> over std::vector<bool>, thus handling the TODO
>>>>>> added in commit 36d0dada6773d7fd7c5ace64c90e723930a3b81e
>>>>>> ("Have std::vector printer's iterator return bool for vector<bool>",
>>>>>> 2019-06-19):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    TODO add printer for vector<bool>'s _Bit_iterator and
>>>>>> _Bit_const_iterator
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (Debian testing).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't filed any copyright assignment for GCC yet, but I'm 
>>>>>> happy to
>>>>>> do so when pointed to the right place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the patch! I'll send you the form to start the copyuright
>>>>> assignment process.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! The copyright assignment is done now. Is there anything else to
>>>> do from my side at the moment?
>>>>
>>>