From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46924 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2017 10:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libstdc++-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libstdc++-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 46906 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2017 10:56:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_SBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:56:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7E1C058EDD; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.33.36.9]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1934D173D1; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:56:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Wakely To: Petr Ovtchenkov Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "2017-10-04 Petr Ovtchenkov " Message-ID: <20171116105629.GK31922@redhat.com> References: <41ed5a91-9b23-97a4-ab38-4728091279d7@gmail.com> <5bef157d-1ae5-3e06-99eb-8f93ff18179b@gmail.com> <2285784f-dfce-3e48-30bf-902fe1d157b8@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On 10/10/17 22:55 +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: >This reverts commit 0dfbafdf338cc6899d146add5161e52efb02c067 >(svn r253417). I'm not even going to bother to review patches sent without any explanation or rationale for the change. I will repeat what Paolo said: changing the ABI is not acceptable.